In the current pandemic context, in which modern society is being challenged not only from a socio-medical point of view, but also from a moral and legal perspective, legislators across the world have been confronted with the fact of identifying a series legislative, concrete and coherent solutions, in order to limit the transmission of SARS-CoV virus 2. From this perspective, it is clear that legislative solutions have been both dissipated as an overview and insufficiently analyzed and

more »

... debated, arousing a wave of controversy and impugnment around the world, an issue that could cause serious concern in the legal world and to really question the citizens' trust in the judicial and constitutional litigation system, which are those designed to resolve legislative inconsistencies, with a direct transposition in the way of resolving various administrative cases before the courts. The situation is not at all special in Romania, which has adopted during the pandemic a series of normative acts that raised a multitude of legal interpretation issues. In this regard, we recall the fact that, on several occasions, the Romanian Constitutional Court has declared unconstitutional the legislative approach of the national authorities, just as the courts have invalidated a series of unilateral administrative acts, with normative character. The GEO no. 129/2021 on the implementation of the digital entry form in Romania also provided heated discussions in the legal field as well as an endless wave of criticism from the recipients of this normative act, which requires a detailed analysis of the issues related to the adoption of this normative act.