Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating

David W. Carmichael, John S. Thornton, Roman Rodionov, Rachel Thornton, Andrew McEvoy, Philip J. Allen, Louis Lemieux
2008 Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging  
Purpose: To investigate heating during postimplantation localization of intracranial electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes by MRI. Materials and Methods: A phantom patient with a realistic arrangement of electrodes was used to simulate tissue heating during MRI. Measurements were performed using 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T MRI scanners, using head-and bodytransmit RF-coils. Two electrode-lead configurations were assessed: a "standard" condition with external electrodeleads physically separated and a
more » ... fault" condition with all lead terminations electrically shorted. Results: Using a head-transmit-receive coil and a 2.4 W/kg head-average specific absorption rate (SAR) sequence, at 1.5T the maximum temperature change remained within safe limits (Ͻ1°C). Under "standard" conditions, we observed greater heating (Յ2.0°C) at 3T on one system and similar heating (Ͻ1°C) on a second, compared with the 1.5T system. In all cases these temperature maxima occurred at the grid electrode. In the "fault" condition, larger temperature increases were observed at both field strengths, particularly for the depth electrodes. Conversely, with a body-transmit coil at 3T significant heating (ϩ6.4°C) was observed (same sequence, 1.2/0.5 W/kg head/body-average) at the grid electrode under "standard" conditions, substantially exceeding safe limits. These temperature increases neglect perfusion, a major source of heat dissipation in vivo. Conclusion: MRI for intracranial electrode localization can be performed safely at both 1.5T and 3T provided a headtransmit coil is used, electrode leads are separated, and scanner-reported SARs are limited as determined in advance for specific scanner models, RF coils and implant arrangements. Neglecting these restrictions may result in tissue injury.
doi:10.1002/jmri.21583 pmid:18972332 pmcid:PMC2883075 fatcat:a3w6yjuasffmxepfyhr4bejdhq