British M'ledical Journal.J CORRESPONDENCE. FMIay 2, 18C3. to Le particularly carefuil how they lend their names to the iurJjllly of A brofther practitionier. TI'lhey seem to thin,k tl)at an obscure coointry practitioner is riot wortlhy usual fair treatynent. 7tlen who act un)scrutpulously towar(ls a brother practitioner can7 scarcely be coIisidered safe hands to entrnt patients to; and I sh-iouldl reconimii-ieid country priactitioniers to bear this in minid. If we do niot showv to tlhe world

more »

... at we respect one aotlier, we canniiot expect the world to respect us as a b)ody. 'T'lhat voii may long contirnue to support the cause of truthl and justice aId mutual courtesy, is the wish of youirs, etc., J. E. S. April 22ind, 1863. SIn,-Every member of the medical profession owes youi a deep debt of gratitude for the bold and able manner in which you have treated the conduct of the nmedlical men called by the plaintiff in the late trial Brorniwich v. Waters. As, in the language you have used, truith has neither been suppressed nor juistice reprobated, I am at a loss to ui-nderstand how D)r. Rams-