Exploring the causal effect of maternal pregnancy adiposity on offspring adiposity: Mendelian randomization using polygenic risk scores [article]

Tom A Bond, Rebecca C Richmond, Ville Karhunen, Gabriel Cuellar-Partida, Maria Carolina Borges, Verena Zuber, Alexessander Couto Alves, Dan Mason, Tiffany C Yang, Marc J Gunter, Abbas Dehghan, Ioanna Tzoulaki (+6 others)
2021 medRxiv   pre-print
It has been hypothesised that greater maternal adiposity before or during pregnancy causes greater offspring adiposity in childhood and adulthood, via causal intrauterine or periconceptional mechanisms. Previous Mendelian randomization (MR) estimates were imprecise, with wide confidence intervals that included potentially important protective or adverse effects, and may have been biased by collider effects or imperfect adjustment for genetic inheritance. Here we use an improved MR approach to
more » ... vestigate whether associations between maternal pre-/early pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and offspring adiposity from birth to adolescence are causal, or are instead due to confounding. Methods and findings We undertook confounder adjusted multivariable (MV) regression and Mendelian randomization (MR) using mother-offspring pairs from two UK cohorts: Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and Born in Bradford (BiB). In ALSPAC and BiB the outcomes were birthweight (BW; N = 9339) and BMI at age 1 (N = 8659) and 4 years (N = 7575), and in ALSPAC only we investigated BMI at 10 (N = 4476) and 15 years (N = 4112) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) determined fat mass index (FMI) from age 10-18 years (N = 2659 to 3855). We compared MR results from several polygenic risk scores (PRS), calculated from maternal non-transmitted alleles at between 29 and 80,939 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). MV and MR showed a consistent positive association of maternal BMI with BW, but for adiposity at most older ages MR estimates were weaker than MV estimates. In MV regression a one standard deviation (SD) higher maternal BMI was associated with a 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10, 0.16) SD increase in offspring BW. The corresponding MR estimate from the strongest PRS (including up to 80,939 SNPs) was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.23), with no difference between the two estimates (Pdifference = 0.84). For 15 year BMI the MV and MR estimates (80,939 SNPs) were 0.32 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.36) and 0.13 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.24) respectively (Pdifference = 1.0e-3). Results for FMI were similar to those for adolescent BMI. As the number of SNPs included in the PRS increased, the MR confidence intervals narrowed and the effect estimates for adolescent adiposity became closer to the MV estimates. Sensitivity analyses suggested the stronger effects with more SNPs were explained by horizontal pleiotropic bias away from zero. Consequently, the unbiased difference between the MV and MR estimates is probably greater than shown in our main analyses. Furthermore, MR estimates from IVs with fewer SNPs provided no strong evidence for a causal effect on adolescent adiposity. Conclusions Our results suggest that higher maternal pre-/early-pregnancy BMI is not a key driver of higher adiposity in the next generation. Thus, they support interventions that target the whole population for reducing overweight and obesity, rather than a specific focus on women of reproductive age.
doi:10.1101/2021.04.01.21251414 fatcat:7jfwh7jrezat3fhgfn3e6ohl2i