A scalable software-based self-test methodology for programmable processors

Li Chen, Srivaths Ravi, Anand Raghunathan, Sujit Dey
2003 Proceedings of the 40th conference on Design automation - DAC '03  
Software-based self-test (SBST) is an emerging approach to address the challenges of high-quality, at-speed test for complex programmable processors and systems-on chips (SoCs) that contain them. While early work on SBST has proposed several promising ideas, many challenges remain in applying SBST to realistic embedded processors. We propose a systematic scalable methodology for SBST that automates several key steps. The proposed methodology consists of (i) identifying test program templates
more » ... t are well suited for test delivery to each module within the processor, (ii) extracting input/output mapping functions that capture the controllability/observability constraints imposed by a test program template for a specific module-under-test, (iii) generating module-level tests by representing the input/output mapping functions as virtual constraint circuits, and (iv) automatic synthesis of a software selftest program from the module-level tests. We propose novel RTL simulation-based techniques for template ranking and selection, and techniques based on the theory of statistical regression for extraction of input/output mapping functions. An important advantage of the proposed techniques is their scalability, which is necessitated by the significant and growing complexity of embedded processors. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed methodology, we have applied it to a commercial state-of-the-art embedded processor (Xtensa™ from Tensilica Inc.). We believe this is the first practical demonstration of software-based self-test on a processor of such complexity. Experimental results demonstrate that software self-test programs generated using the proposed methodology are able to detect most (95.2%) of the functionally testable faults, and achieve significant simultaneous improvements in fault coverage and test length compared with conventional functional test.
doi:10.1145/775832.775973 dblp:conf/dac/ChenRRD03 fatcat:o4xpg2w3hjhi3kmitlgvmaob4y