Internet Archive Scholar

There's No Such Thing as a Computer-Authored Work — And It's a Good Thing, Too [post]

James Grimmelmann
2017 unpublished

Preserved Fulltext

fulltext thumbnail
Web Archive Capture PDF (919.5 kB)
https://web.archive.org/web/20190430035334/https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2617&context=facpub

A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL. The file type is application/pdf.

I would like to talk about computer-authored works—I would like to, except that they don't exist. Copyright law doesn't recognize computer programs as authors, and it shouldn't. Some day it might make sense to, but if that day ever comes, copyright will be the least of our concerns. Instead, I will say something about why computer authorship is such a "bad penny of a question," to use Annemarie Bridy's felicitous phrase, even though it is so utterly speculative. The scholarship pondering the
more » ... sibility of computer-authored works is surprisingly extensive, even though no one has ever exhibited even one work that could plausibly claim to have a computer for an "author" in the sense that the Copyright Act uses the term.Published: 39 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 403 (2016)
doi:10.31228/osf.io/rk8cm fatcat:4wlxb2orwjh5tlib6yuyviz5gq
Citation

James Grimmelmann. "There's No Such Thing as a Computer-Authored Work — And It's a Good Thing, Too." (2017)