Deep Learning in CT Images: Automated Pulmonary Nodule Detection for Subsequent Management Using Convolutional Neural Network

Xu YM, Zhang T, Xu H, Qi L, Zhang W, Zhang YD, Gao DS, Yuan M, Yu TF
2020 Cancer Management and Research  
Yi-Ming Xu,1 Teng Zhang,1 Hai Xu,1 Liang Qi,1 Wei Zhang,1 Yu-Dong Zhang,1 Da-Shan Gao,2 Mei Yuan,1 Tong-Fu Yu1 1Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China; 2 12sigma Technologies, San Diego, California, USACorrespondence: Mei Yuan; Tong-Fu YuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China, 210009 Tel
more » ... 405835354; +86-13813810516Fax +86-02568136861Email yuanmeijiangsu@163.com; njmu_ytf@163.comPurpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the detection performance of the 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) models with radiologists of different levels of experience in detecting pulmonary nodules on thin-section computed tomography (CT).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1109 consecutive patients who underwent follow-up thin-section CT at our institution. The 3D CNN model for nodule detection was re-trained and complemented by expert augmentation. The annotations of a consensus panel consisting of two expert radiologists determined the ground truth. The detection performance of the re-trained CAD model and three other radiologists at different levels of experience were tested using a free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis in the test group.Results: The detection performance of the re-trained CAD model was significantly better than that of the pre-trained network (sensitivity: 93.09% vs 38.44%). The re-trained CAD model had a significantly better detection performance than radiologists (average sensitivity: 93.09% vs 50.22%), without significantly increasing the number of false positives per scan (1.64 vs 0.68). In the training set, 922 nodules less than 3 mm in size in 211 patients at high risk were recommended for follow-up CT according to the Fleischner Society Guidelines. Fifteen of 101 solid nodules were confirmed to be lung c [...]
doaj:489bb6e7bac64fc39a6f5fbf263a69e1 fatcat:irywxyyn3zeslddnaer2evoejm