Uncertain deduction and conditional reasoning

Jonathan St. B. T. Evans, Valerie A. Thompson, David E. Over
2015 Frontiers in Psychology  
There has been a paradigm shift in the psychology of deductive reasoning. Many researchers no longer think it is appropriate to ask people to assume premises and decide what necessarily follows, with the results evaluated by binary extensional logic. Most every day and scientific inference is made from more or less confidently held beliefs and not assumptions, and the relevant normative standard is Bayesian probability theory. We argue that the study of "uncertain deduction" should directly ask
more » ... people to assign probabilities to both premises and conclusions, and report an experiment using this method. We assess this reasoning by two Bayesian metrics: probabilistic validity and coherence according to probability theory. On both measures, participants perform above chance in conditional reasoning, but they do much better when statements are grouped as inferences, rather than evaluated in separate tasks.
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00398 pmid:25904888 pmcid:PMC4389288 fatcat:bb37aks43bauzfn4qclakbtdye