Computational investigation of the aerodynamic effects on fluidic thrust vectoring

Karen Deere
2000 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit   unpublished
A computational investigation of the aerodynamic effects on fluidic thrust vectoring has been conducted. Threedimensional simulations of a two-dimensional, convergent-divergent (2DCD) nozzle with fluidic injection for pitch vector control were run with the computational fluid dynamics code PAB using turbulence closure and linear Reynolds stress modeling. Simulations were computed with static freestream conditions (M=0.05) and at Mach numbers from M=0.3 to 1.2, with scheduled nozzle pressure
more » ... os from 3.6 to 7.2 and secondary to primary total pressure ratios of p t,s /p t,p =0.6 and 1.0. Results indicate that the freestream flow decreases vectoring performance and thrust efficiency compared with static (wind-off) conditions. The aerodynamic penalty to thrust vector angle ranged from 1.5 degrees at a nozzle pressure ratio of 6 with M=0.9 freestream conditions to 2.9 degrees at a nozzle pressure ratio of 5.2 with M=0.7 freestream conditions, compared to the same nozzle pressure ratios with static freestream conditions. The aerodynamic penalty to thrust ratio decreased from 4 percent to 0.8 percent as nozzle pressure ratio increased from 3.6 to 7.2. As expected, the freestream flow had little influence on discharge coefficient.
doi:10.2514/6.2000-3598 fatcat:k5nvhsqvhza2joww426tf4fkhu