A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Thus is afforded excellent proof of his imperfect knowledge of the theories of certain doctors whom he calls " quacks." Personally I use LAbrams's miietlhod and believe in the psychic ratioinale of the svstemii, although miiy conception of this rationale is probably widely differ-ent from that of Professor Clark. So possibly I am in favour. But what of those whlo do not expl-ai'n the Abrams plhenomelna on a psychic hypothesis? There should be nio difficulty for Professor Clark. He hasdoi:10.1136/bmj.2.3484.706-c fatcat:psd5iqjzzbdurk5bg2rgvnzezu