Results 30% consented to take part. Data were analysed for the first 64 study participants, evaluating care received from uniformed police (n = 51), specialist sexual offences investigative techniques (SOIT) officers (n = 58) and clinical staff at the SARCs (doctors and crisis workers, n = 64). 97% were police referrals and 3%, self-referrals. 67% had experienced vaginal rape, 32%, oral rape and 12%, anal rape. 90% underwent a forensic medical examination. Commonly held fears before accessing

more »

... re were that they would be judged, disbelieved, 'blamed' or 'called a liar'. Many participants were apprehensive that the forensic examination would be painful, embarrassing or reveal health problems such as infections. As shown in Figure 1 , care given by clinical staff at SARCs was consistently rated higher than police care. Only 49% found uniformed police easy to talk to and only 64% felt safe in their care. Only 63% felt believed by their SOIT officer and only 59% felt they had been given enough information (Figure 1 ). Conclusions Many participants described positive experiences of systems of care for victims of sexual assault. However, variable experiences of care between services highlight the need for improvement in specific areas. Anxieties about being blamed or judged may prevent adolescents accessing services following sexual assault. Aims This series of studies considers the challenges faced when caring for young people with eating disorders on children's wards, suggesting approaches to improving quality of care. Abstract G147 Figure 1 Adolescent experiences of care following sexual assault