A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
The planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practice
2019
Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning
In this article, I set out different relationships between planning theory, research and practice, drawing on Lacan's "production of four discourses". I argue that each element of the planning theory-research-practice 'triad' acts as the discursive 'agent' and gives rise to particular kinds of 'subject-planner' (the 'master', the 'expert', the 'idealistic' and the 'pragmatic') with specific ideological upshots ('hidden' big other, 'feigned' big other, hysteria and subjective destitution).
doi:10.2478/rara-2019-0009
fatcat:ojr5kfhigba67joutsnr36y3za