A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Objective The aim of this study was to compare clinical findings obtained in the treatment of gingival recessions using subepithelial connective tissue graft (SECT), acellular dermal matrix (ADM), and enamel matrix proteins (EMP). Material and method Twelve patients with Miller class I and II recession in the canines or upper premolars were randomly divided into groups to receive treatments using SECT, ADM, or EMP. Clinical measurements were performed before and three months after surgicaldoi:10.1590/1807-2577.19515 fatcat:6joyxinevjfcjdtg45l4btiibm