A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit <a rel="external noopener" href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.01189v1.pdf">the original URL</a>. The file type is <code>application/pdf</code>.
<span class="release-stage" >pre-print</span>
The contribution of this paper is fourfold. The first contribution is a novel, generic method for automatic ground truth generation of camera-captured document images (books, magazines, articles, invoices, etc.). It enables us to build large-scale (i.e., millions of images) labeled camera-captured/scanned documents datasets, without any human intervention. The method is generic, language independent and can be used for generation of labeled documents datasets (both scanned and cameracaptured)<span class="external-identifiers"> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01189v1">arXiv:1605.01189v1</a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/release/ldykx3z7yrb63aloo2arqk5mvy">fatcat:ldykx3z7yrb63aloo2arqk5mvy</a> </span>
more »... any cursive and non-cursive language, e.g., English, Russian, Arabic, Urdu, etc. To assess the effectiveness of the presented method, two different datasets in English and Russian are generated using the presented method. Evaluation of samples from the two datasets shows that 99:98% of the images were correctly labeled. The second contribution is a large dataset (called C3Wi) of camera-captured characters and words images, comprising 1 million word images (10 million character images), captured in a real camera-based acquisition. This dataset can be used for training as well as testing of character recognition systems on camera-captured documents. The third contribution is a novel method for the recognition of cameracaptured document images. The proposed method is based on Long Short-Term Memory and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods for camera based OCRs. As a fourth contribution, various benchmark tests are performed to uncover the behavior of commercial (ABBYY), open source (Tesseract), and the presented camera-based OCR using the presented C3Wi dataset. Evaluation results reveal that the existing OCRs, which already get very high accuracies on scanned documents, have limited performance on camera-captured document images; where ABBYY has an accuracy of 75%, Tesseract an accuracy of 50.22%, while the presented character recognition system has an accuracy of 95.10%.
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200911165529/https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.01189v1.pdf" title="fulltext PDF download" data-goatcounter-click="serp-fulltext" data-goatcounter-title="serp-fulltext"> <button class="ui simple right pointing dropdown compact black labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="icon ia-icon"></i> Web Archive [PDF] <div class="menu fulltext-thumbnail"> <img src="https://blobs.fatcat.wiki/thumbnail/pdf/31/21/3121fa65f75e61834e552a0189962f7fc8806e2a.180px.jpg" alt="fulltext thumbnail" loading="lazy"> </div> </button> </a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01189v1" title="arxiv.org access"> <button class="ui compact blue labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="file alternate outline icon"></i> arxiv.org </button> </a>