A Comparative Study of the Play Activities of Adult Savages and Civilized Children [review-book]

Kate Gordon
1910 The Journal of Philosophy Psychology and Scientific Methods  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate--jstor/individuals/early-journal--content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. 718 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY attacks of moralists, social reformers, and pragmatists blandly states that nevertheless " truth is discouraging (though " truth has nothing to do with life ") and it is from the outside, from religious revelation alone that comfort can be brought to us "? (This JOURNAL, Vol. IV., p. 435.) As if this revelation itself could be anything else than additional " truth," in the author's sense of truth; and as if such a statement were not a confession that this pure thought, pure truth, and pure science, whose banner has been so heroically defended, is not only " discouraging," but since it must be supplemented from the "outside" (outside of what?) by "religious revelation" is therefore fragmentary and not strictly pure after all; and as if, since truth as such is " deterministic," this supplementary truth revealed from the " outside " could be any less " deterministic" than that we already have; as if, indeed, as coming from the " outside" it must not be much more so. In the next sentence the author finds comfort in reflecting that while he may be " naYve " (according to some of his readers) he is " at least in good Christian company." Some, however, may wonder how much comfort the company of Christians will take on discovering that one of their number teaches that in so far as their doctrines are "true" they are "deterministic " and " discouraging." The source of these and any number of other variations of the same fundamental paradox is the total failure to see that the proposed cure for the alleged opposition of scientific truth and morality, namely, " revelation from the outside," is one of the chief causes, indeed a most aggravated form of the disease itself. A purely revealed truth, a science consisting of an accumulation of facts and laws rained down and collected as manna in the wilderness, is indeed "deterministic" and "renders inconceivable the voice of conscience." But how this is to be cured by more of the same thing, except on the homeopathic dogma of similia similibus curantur, is difficult to see. And it would be in vain to protest that this point ignores the assumed essential distinction between scientific and revealed truth, since (1) there is nowhere any attempt at a statement of what this distinction is: and (2) in teaching that revelation is to supplement and make good the imperfections of "deterministic" and "discouraging" scientific truth the author himself abandons the distinction since this supplementation implies some sort of connection.
doi:10.2307/2012604 fatcat:lx6tqrwtkzfurlxj4t2fonnala