A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Estimating Peak Work Rate during Incremental Cycle Ergometry from the 6-Minute Walk Distance: Differences between Reference Equations
2011
Respiration
the equations. There was substantial variation in estimates of peak work between equations (range 1-75 Watts difference) with a coefficient of variation of 35%. Differences were greater in men than in women (p ! 0.001). The Luxton equation predicted higher peak work than the Hill equation in younger subjects and at work rates over 50 Watts. Estimated training work rate differed by more than 20 Watts in 18 subjects (28%). Conclusions: This comparison of reference equations for predicting peak
doi:10.1159/000308464
pmid:20357426
fatcat:jgvyu7zd7zewxdiuuafvgyx5fm