A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2021; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
What Does the Vavřička Judgement Tell Us About the Compatibility of Compulsory COVID-19 Vaccinations with the ECHR?
2021
Preserved Fulltext
On the 8th of April, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ('the Court') issued its widely-anticipated judgement on Vav#i#ka and others v. the Czech Republic shedding some light on its view on mandatory vaccinations. As public discussions on COVID-19 vaccines multiply and some States waveringly lean towards compulsory vaccinations policies, the Court's judgement could not have been any timelier, since it provides useful guidelines on the circumstances, under which compulsory
doi:10.17176/20210421-100920-0
fatcat:vvw3niudcnci3nrfrvwz6owygi