A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2012; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
-In the Internet-able era reviewers are faced with an increased number of manuscripts and decreased time to review. In order to maintain the same, if not higher level of quality in the peer-review process, a net gain in productivity is required. Our goal is to present a manuscript peer-review checklist to help reviewers achieve this secondary yet critical task in a more systematic fashion. Methods -To this end, we have compiled, structured and processed information from nine referencedoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.065 pmid:18053748 fatcat:274o6rkgxrhmrotf6bdcqlbkme