Internet Archive Scholar

Missing in the Census 1851-1911: The 'lost', 'missing', and 'gaps' in I-CeM and BBCE, with weights to adjust RSD populations

Robert Bennett, Carry Van Lieshout, Kevin Schürer, Apollo-University Of Cambridge Repository, Apollo-University Of Cambridge Repository
2020

Preserved Fulltext

fulltext thumbnail
Web Archive Capture PDF (1.9 MB)
https://web.archive.org/web/20211210171148/https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/303102/WP%2023%20MISSING%20IN%20CENSUS.pdf;jsessionid=B3775D087ACD68E23385516C99CBC5D4?sequence=1

A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2021; you can also visit the original URL. The file type is application/pdf.

WP 23 first outlines the various gaps in e-census records from BBCE and I-CeM and how they have arisen. It assesses sources for identifying archivally lost records and compares these with the BBCE and I-CeM databases at the level of RSDs for census years 1851-6, and 1881-1911. The paper develops weights to compensate for the identified gaps and provides downloads of weights to be used with I-CeM and/or BBCE.
doi:10.17863/cam.50179 fatcat:ogp4cpow4rc6hpste77popthwm
Open Access
Citation

Robert Bennett, Carry Van Lieshout, Kevin Schürer, Apollo-University Of Cambridge Repository, Apollo-University Of Cambridge Repository. "Missing in the Census 1851-1911: The 'lost', 'missing', and 'gaps' in I-CeM and BBCE, with weights to adjust RSD populations." (2020)