VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness

Robert J. MacCoun
2005 Annual Review of Law and Social Science  
The procedural justice literature has grown enormously since the early work of Thibaut and Walker in the 1970s. Since then, the finding that citizens care enormously about the process by which outcomes are reached -even unfavorable outcomes -has been replicated using a wide range of methodologies (including panel surveys, psychometric work, and experimentation), cultures (throughout North America, Europe, and Asia), and settings (including tort litigation, policing, taxpayer compliance, support
more » ... for public policies, and organizational citizenship). We have learned a great deal about the antecedents and consequences of these judgments. In particular, the work of Tom Tyler and Allan Lind and their colleagues suggests that people care about voice, dignity, and respect for relational and symbolic rather than (or in addition to) instrumental reasons. This has benevolent implications for governance and social cooperation, but also some troubling implications, leaving people susceptible to manipulation and exploitation.
doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958 fatcat:27mh4ndkb5cnhczsj4fyuh2gmi