Clark on the Amount of Difference That Should Characterize Species and Subspecies The Limits of Difference in Specific and Subspecific Distinctions Hubert Lyman Clark
[review-book]
J. A. A.
1905
The AUK: A Quarterly Journal of Ornithology
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more »
... ntent at http://about.jstor.org/participate--jstor/individuals/early-journal--content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Vol. XXI] Recent Literature. 429 of 6 (= 7 forms) to each, P. major and P. palustris each having I3, P. ater L, etc. The Alaskan Budytesflavus alascensis Ridgw. stands as Motacillaftava alascensis; the North American Anthes pensylvanicus as A. spinoletta fSensylvanica. Eremophila is used in place of Otocoris, since in the opinion of Mr. Hartert the generic names Rremopohilus and E-emopAhila are both tenable. It may here be also noted that froin his point of view a specific or subspecific name need not agree in gender with the generic name, it being his preference to preserve the original ending of a specific name when transferred to a genus which has a different gender ending, as in the case above of Anthus pensylvanicus, which was originally described as a species of Alauta. It may be further noted that the palearctic species of Otocoris here recognized number I5, all subspecies of altestris, as against I4 recently admitted by Oberholser, who, however, gave full specific rank to 5 of them. But in only nine cases are the same names adopted. Despite certain excentricities of treatment, Dr. Hartert's 'D ie Vogel der palaarktischen Fauna' will long prove a most useful and convenient hand-book, for which ornithologists may well feel deeply grateful.-J. A. A. Receut, Literature.
doi:10.2307/4070033
fatcat:pypl2s6z65bndghaqg6aifxgci