ClOOCl photolysis at high solar zenith angles: analysis of the RECONCILE self-match flight

O. Sumińska-Ebersoldt, R. Lehmann, T. Wegner, J.-U. Grooß{}, E. Hösen, R. Weigel, C. M. Volk, S. Borrmann, M. Rex, F. Stroh, M. von Hobe
2011 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions  
The photolysis rate constant of dichlorine peroxide (ClOOCl, ClO dimer) J ClOOCl is a critical parameter in catalytic cycles destroying ozone (O 3 ) in the polar stratosphere. In the atmospherically relevant wavelength region (λ > 310 nm), significant discrepancies between laboratory measurements of ClOOCl absorption cross sections and spectra cause a large uncertainty in J ClOOCl . Previous investigations of the consistency of published J ClOOCl with atmospheric observations of chlorine
more » ... e (ClO) and ClOOCl have focused on the photochemical equilibrium between ClOOCl formation and photolysis, and thus could only constrain the ratio of J ClOOCl over the ClOOCl formation rate constant k rec . Here, we constrain the atmospherically effective J ClOOCl independent of k rec , using ClO measured in the same air masses before and directly after sunrise during an aircraft flight that was part of the RECONCILE field campaign in the winter 2010 from Kiruna, Sweden. Over sunrise, when the ClO/ClOOCl system comes out of thermal equilibrium and the influence of the ClO recombination reaction is negligible, the increase in ClO concentrations is significantly faster than expected from J ClOOCl based on the absorption spectrum proposed by Pope et al. (2007) , but does not warrant cross sections larger than recently published values by Papanastasiou et al. (2009) . In particular, the existence of a significant ClOOCl absorption band longwards of 420 nm is not supported by our observations. The observed night-time ClO would not be consistent with a ClO/ClOOCl thermal equilibrium constant significantly higher than the one proposed by Plenge et al. (2005) . Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1353-1365, 2012 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/1353/2012/
doi:10.5194/acpd-11-18901-2011 fatcat:wcn7ohfnqzb6tgbrbwhcwgyo74