A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2012; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
A rich and diverse set of potential bibliometric and scientometric predictors of research performance quality and importance are emerging today, from the classic metrics (publication counts, journal impact factors and individual article/author citation counts) to promising new online metrics such as download counts, hub/authority scores and growth/decay chronometrics. In and of themselves, however, metrics are circular: They need to be jointly tested and validated against what it is that theydoi:10.3354/esep00088 fatcat:qpwz362z6bhmnngma3pxruoh5i