Physical (im)mobility is central to many interactions between human society and the biophysical world. The chapter presents arguments for and against the 'mobilisation' of environmental sociology. Drawing on Urry's (2000Urry's ( , 2007 'new mobilities paradigm', it asks how such a 'mobility turn' might affect the conceptual and methodological focus of this sub-discipline, including its ability to challenge more conventional, anthropocentric approaches to sociological theory and research. It

more »

... es that a preoccupation with mobility, while beneficial in many ways, can eclipse more 'static' (or at any rate more 'a-mobile') influences on social life such as the continued impact of national political institutions on citizens' social and physical (im)mobility and the regulation of social-environmental change. Environmental sociology, a field of inquiry committed to the systematic study of environment-society relations, seems ideally positioned to address some of these mobility issues, and in turn benefit from sociological approaches that take mobility seriously. Turner BS (2007) The enclave society: towards a sociology of immobility. Eur J Soc Theory 10:287-304 Turner BS (2006) Classical sociology and cosmopolitanism: a critical defence of the social. Br J Sociol 57:133-151 Urry J (1981) Sociology as a parasite: some vices and virtues. In: Abrams P, Deem R, Finch J, Rock P (eds) Practice and progress: