A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2021; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Addendum to my Review to the promoter(s):
[post]
2021
unpublished
Most of the comment I made in this review are quite basic as they highlight elementary errors (insufficient treatment of the data and over-interpretation of the results, notably). By having often worked with PhD students in their early career, I know that such "youthful errors" are frequent. They are, to my opinion excusable and probably normal for beginner scientists. However, it is the responsibility of the promoter(s) to correct them and help the PhD student driving his/her analysis and this
doi:10.5194/bg-2020-420-rc2
fatcat:eok2gl5mobbehk57wrcxmxatmq