Robust Trust in Expert Testimony

Christian Dahlman, Lena Wahlberg, Farhan Sarwar
2015 Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies  
The standard of proof in criminal trials should require that the evidence presented by the prosecution is robust. This requirement of robustness says that it must be unlikely that additional information would change the probability that the defendant is guilty. Robustness is difficult for a judge to estimate, as it requires the judge to assess the possible effect of information that the he or she does not have. This article is concerned with expert witnesses and proposes a method for reviewing
more » ... he robustness of expert testimony. According to the proposed method, the robustness of expert testimony is estimated with regard to competence, motivation, external strength, internal strength and relevance. The danger of trusting non-robust expert testimony is illustrated with an analysis of the Thomas Quick Case, a Swedish legal scandal where a patient at a mental institution was wrongfully convicted for eight murders.
doaj:673e09e2d59747d4bed3791744dfb6a2 fatcat:ep2m647ufbek7ftb6ljzexxjyq