Design of Industrial and Supra-Firm Architectures: Growth and Sustainability

John A. Mathews
2012 Journal of Organization Design  
The scope of organization design has expanded steadily from work-flow issues and job specifications to firm-level considerations and now to supra-firm industrial structures, where such issues as modularity and clustering loom large. economic analysis has made little headway in analyzing how increasing returns may be generated through suprafirm structures such as networks and clusters, nor in the question of how their industrial architecture (modular vs. integral, open vs. closed) affects
more » ... c performance. The focus here is on the supra-firm industrial architectures that have arisen, either spontaneously through the evolution of capitalism or through purposeful design, involving both state and private actors. Striking cases such as the Chinese automotive industry, which started with the production of conventional automobiles and motorcycles and now encompasses both two-wheeled and four-wheeled electric vehicles, provide testimony to the power of some industrial configurations to outperform others. My analyses and arguments are placed in the global context of the urgent need to find ways to accelerate the uptake of green technologies (such as electric vehicles) in order to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and at the same time promote the industrialization of countries still at lower levels of income and wealth. 1 fine contrasts modular with closed product architectures and their linked supply chain organizational architectures. Voordijk, Meijboom, and De Haan (2006) provide an interesting test of the proposition that modular supply chains enhance the effect of modular product architectures, in the case of the construction industry, Mathews (1996) treats the same issues utilizing the terminology "holonic."
doi:10.7146/jod.1.2.6454 fatcat:stm7qeuyizc4fcoqwig2akz4uq