A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
I discuss three ways of responding to the logical omniscience problems faced by traditional 'possible worlds' epistemic logics. Two of these responses were put forward by Hintikka and the third by Cresswell; all three have been influential in the literature on epistemic logic. I show that both of Hintikka's responses fail and present some problems for Cresswell's. Although Cresswell's approach can be amended to avoid certain unpalatable consequences, the resulting formal framework collapses todoi:10.12775/llp.2006.019 fatcat:smtiyv2elbca5cji2fadhzyk7y