Comparisons of finite-element code calculations to hydrostatically loaded subassembly-duct experiments [report]

J E Ash, T J Marciniak
1977 unpublished
DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. MOTICE T k i~ repMt w a s prepwGd ss 'a a-zocwz~kaf wnprk apana.owe& by UnJiead Staterr Cbvreoment. Ueibhet &e UnXeB 6tlubee wr &e U~iiPied %aka &exlgy.Res&a~~cikr and ~eve;Lay?m&A+ &iII;attra-, neb of empl,opea, nor any izg tb4.r cw&riio@rs, ~&rent~a~b;arar ar ch%r emglopegk, f)la&s ; B T I ,~ w%rrax&y, a@saSsl or i.rjllpliBd, clr a s s u m e any
more » ... & lj!abElktyax rsspo-aaiMlfb fur ths aieoartcy, cashpbkeaspre sr a mftrheius iof m y Wosmatiqa, ztppsraias* proiibct O* ,grhkea~ r9.i&~lwa&, or zepFwenpr; t h e i t s arcs& &oul+d ~E F S . Ur&gat griu;stely-&??med rig%&. M&&oa k?f cons&ae-rcial pr@!&u~ts, their nwmu%%tm~rs, Or their ~tlpplkrs fn +I5 -pUbli"~+tiaa does adrt irr c6&mote approval 6r &stpp%ovd ef .the-pke&~L byi%zp-Hakitma,% 2&botabay or: &@ Cf . S. Enwgyr Lie33swck atrd, ~dtfkh&%%iw Atk&i$€~:&i~a.
doi:10.2172/7213744 fatcat:ianaqkg25nefxn3n5cthhvgrzq