A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2016; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Legal shifts in the process of proof
2011
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law - ICAIL '11
In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrativeargumentative approach to evidential reasoning in the law by showing the interaction between factual reasoning and legal reasoning. We therefore emphasize the role of legal story schemes (as opposed to factual story schemes that formed the heart of our previous proposal). Legal story schemes steer what needs to be proven, but are also selected on the basis of what can be proven. They provide a coherent, holistic legal perspective on a
doi:10.1145/2018358.2018360
dblp:conf/icail/BexV11
fatcat:bmg7eu2nevd2lls4c6paoeigoy