Synaptic circuits and their variations within different columns in the visual system ofDrosophila

Shin-ya Takemura, C. Shan Xu, Zhiyuan Lu, Patricia K. Rivlin, Toufiq Parag, Donald J. Olbris, Stephen Plaza, Ting Zhao, William T. Katz, Lowell Umayam, Charlotte Weaver, Harald F. Hess (+17 others)
2015 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America  
We reconstructed the synaptic circuits of seven columns in the second neuropil or medulla behind the fly's compound eye. These neurons embody some of the most stereotyped circuits in one of the most miniaturized of animal brains. The reconstructions allow us, for the first time to our knowledge, to study variations between circuits in the medulla's neighboring columns. This variation in the number of synapses and the types of their synaptic partners has previously been little addressed because
more » ... ethods that visualize multiple circuits have not resolved detailed connections, and existing connectomic studies, which can see such connections, have not so far examined multiple reconstructions of the same circuit. Here, we address the omission by comparing the circuits common to all seven columns to assess variation in their connection strengths and the resultant rates of several different and distinct types of connection error. Error rates reveal that, overall, <1% of contacts are not part of a consensus circuit, and we classify those contacts that supplement (E+) or are missing from it (E−). Autapses, in which the same cell is both presynaptic and postsynaptic at the same synapse, are occasionally seen; two cells in particular, Dm9 and Mi1, form ≥20-fold more autapses than do other neurons. These results delimit the accuracy of developmental events that establish and normally maintain synaptic circuits with such precision, and thereby address the operation of such circuits. They also establish a precedent for error rates that will be required in the new science of connectomics. neural circuits | stereotypy | biological error rates | reconstruction error rates
doi:10.1073/pnas.1509820112 pmid:26483464 pmcid:PMC4640747 fatcat:hdcko2uruvgave6l75timt4ua4