Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy

A.K. Kasinadhuni, A. Indahlastari, M. Chauhan, Michael Schär, T.H. Mareci, R.J. Sadleir
2017 Brain Stimulation  
Background-It has been assumed that effects caused by tDCS or tACS neuromodulation are due to electric current flow within brain structures. However, to date, direct current density distributions in the brains of human subjects have not been measured. Instead computational models of tDCS or tACS have been used to predict electric current and field distributions for dosimetry and mechanism analysis purposes. Objective/Hypothesis-We present the first in vivo images of electric current density
more » ... ributions within the brain in four subjects undergoing transcranial electrical stimulation. Methods-Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) techniques encode current flow in phase images. In four human subjects, we used MREIT to measure magnetic flux density distributions caused by tACS currents, and then calculated current density distributions from these data. Computational models of magnetic flux and current distribution, constructed using contemporaneously collected T 1 -weighted structural MRI images, were co-registered to compare predicted and experimental results. Results-We found consistency between experimental and simulated magnetic flux and current density distributions using transtemporal (T7-T8) and anterior-posterior (Fpz-Oz) electrode montages, and also differences that may indicate a need to improve models to better interpret experimental results. While human subject data agreed with computational model predictions in † overall scale, differences may result from factors such as effective electrode surface area and conductivities assumed in models. Conclusions-We believe this method may be useful in improving reproducibility, assessing safety, and ultimately aiding understanding of mechanisms of action in electrical and magnetic neuromodulation modalities. Recently developed MR electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) [9] methods make it possible to reconstruct conductivity and current density distributions in subjects using only one component (B z ) of magnetic flux density vectors. One MREIT method, DT-MREIT [10], can be used to reconstruct full anisotropic conductivities and current density distributions using MREIT and diffusion tensor image data gathered from the same subject, and has recently been demonstrated in canines [11] . Functional MRI has been used to characterize responses to tES [12] [13] [14] and it has been noted that current administration creates artifacts on MR images [15] . One group used fMRI Kasinadhuni et al.
doi:10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.125 pmid:28457836 pmcid:PMC5513732 fatcat:5zqyqzmfivhtncyxribh36bkgi