Apstrakt Uvod/Cilj. Prevencija posledica nagluvosti postiže se ranim ispitivanjem kohlearne funkcije kod novorođenčadi, ali i kontinuiranim praćenjem sluha u ranom detinjstvu. Cilj ove studije bio je da se ispita pouzdanost i izvodljivost otoakustičkih emisija (OAE) u ispitivanju sluha kod dece, proceni učestalosti i vrste oštećenja sluha i preciziraju etioloških faktora ovih oštećenja. Metode. U studiji je ispitano 133 dece, uzrasta od 2 do 7,5 godina, na oba uva metodom tranzitornih (TEOAE) i

more »

... distorzionih (DPOAE) otoakustičkih emisija. Pre izvođenja ovih testova svoj deci rađen je otoskopski pregled. U slučajevima negativnog ishoda bilo kog testa i/ili odstupanja otoskopskog nalaza od normale na makar i jednom uvu, zakazivana je audiološka procena da bi se potvrdilo ili isključilo oštećenje sluha. Rezultati. Kod 85% dece otoskopski nalazi i rezultati testiranja sluha bili su obostrano uredni. Na dodatno audiološko ispitivanje upućeno je 15% dece. Uočen je visok stepen korelacije između otoskopskog nalaza i rezultata selektivnog testiranja (za TEOAE slaganje 95%, za DPOAE 93%). Kod urednog nalaza na timpanometriji najčešće bio je uredan i rezultat selektivnog testiranja. Senzitivnost testa TEOAE iznosila je 94,12%, specifičnost 78,95%, dok je senzitivnost testa DPOAE bila 87,50%, a njena specifičnost 75%. Nagluvost je bila prisutna kod 6,76% dece, konduktivna kod 6,01%, a senzorineuralna kod 0,75%. Konduktivna nagluvost bila je posledica hroničnog sekretornog otitisa kod 25% dece, a adhezivnog procesa u srednjem uvu kod 8,33%. Senzorineuralna nagluvost bila je posledica primene ototoksičnih lekova. Zaključak. Testovi TEOAE i/ili DPOAE pouzdane su, neinvazivne, lako i brzo izvodljive metode ispitivanja sluha kod dece. Ključne reči: sluh, ispitivanje; sluh, poremećaj; osetljivost i specifičnost; deca, predškolska; preventivnomedicinska zaštita. Abstract Background/Aim. Prevention of the consequences of hearing loss can be accomplished by early hearing screening of the cochlear function in newborus, but also with continuous hearing screening in the early childhood. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and feasibility of otoacoustic emissions (OAE) in hearing screening in children, evaluate the frequency and type of hearing loss and determine etiological factors of these losses. Methods. In the study, 133 children, aged 2 to 7.5 years, were tested on both ears with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortionproduct otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). Before screening tests all children had undergone otoscopic examination. If children had not passed either or both hearing screening tests and/or abnormal otoscopic findings in at least one ear, audiological evaluation was scheduled to confirm or exclude hearing loss. Results. Eighty-five percent of children passed the hearing and otoscopic screening bilaterally. For additional audiologic tests 15% of children were referred. Agreement between otoscopic examination and screening tests was very good (agreement for TEOAE 95%, for DPOAE 93%). The results showed that normal tympanograms were very likely to be associated with normal screening tests. Sensitivity of TEOAE test was 94.12%, specificity 78.95%, while DPOAE sensitivity was 87.50% and specificity 75%. Hearing loss was found in 6.76% of the cases, conductive in 6.01% and sensorineural in 0.75%. Conductive hearing loss was a consequence of chronic otitis media with effusion in 25% of the cases, and a consequence of adhesive process in the middle ear in 8.33% of cases. Sensorineural hearing loss was a consequence of using ototoxic medications. Conclusion. TEOAE and/or DPOAE tests are reliable, noninvasive, and feasible methods for hearing screening in childhood.