A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2018; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
University of North Carolina Press
Much of the philosophical literature on health inequalities seeks to establish the superiority of one or another conception of luck egalitarianism. In recent years, however, an increasing number of self-avowed egalitarian philosophers have proposed replacing luck egalitarianism with alternatives that stress the moral relevance of distinct relationships, rather than the moral relevance of good or bad luck. After briefly explaining why the author is not attracted to luck egalitarianism, thedoi:10.5149/northcarolina/9781469630359.003.0004 fatcat:tfddbiusfjbzxd2i2y5ak2cxbe