A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit <a rel="external noopener" href="https://www.intlpress.com/site/pub/files/_fulltext/journals/sii/2017/0010/0004/SII-2017-0010-0004-a008.pdf">the original URL</a>. The file type is <code>application/pdf</code>.
<i title="International Press of Boston">
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/container/op2nporwsjcpne4gikw3jf6pwm" style="color: black;">Statistics and its Interface</a>
For a continuous-scale diagnostic test, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a popular summary measure to assess the test's ability to discriminate between healthy and diseased subjects. In some studies, verification of the true disease status is performed only for a subset of subjects, selected possibly on the basis of the test result and of other characteristics of the subjects. Estimators of the AUC based only on this subset of subjects are typically biased;<span class="external-identifiers"> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.4310/sii.2017.v10.n4.a8">doi:10.4310/sii.2017.v10.n4.a8</a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/release/yl72k5rruvbkvibmjtfg5hp2z4">fatcat:yl72k5rruvbkvibmjtfg5hp2z4</a> </span>
more »... s is known as verification bias. Some methods have been proposed to correct verification bias, but they require parametric models for the (conditional) probability of disease and/or the (conditional) probability of verification. A wrong specification of such parametric models can affect the behaviour of the estimators, which can be inconsistent. To avoid misspecification problems, in this paper we propose a fully nonparametric method for the estimation of the AUC of a continuous test under verification bias. The method is based on nearest-neighbor imputation and adopts generic smooth regression models for both the probability that a subject is diseased and the probability that it is verified. The new AUC estimator is consistent under the assumption that the true disease status, if missing, is missing at random (MAR). A simple extension which deals with stratified samples is also provided. Simulation experiments are used to investigate the finite sample behaviour of the proposed methods. An illustrative example is presented.
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20201209165918/https://www.intlpress.com/site/pub/files/_fulltext/journals/sii/2017/0010/0004/SII-2017-0010-0004-a008.pdf" title="fulltext PDF download" data-goatcounter-click="serp-fulltext" data-goatcounter-title="serp-fulltext"> <button class="ui simple right pointing dropdown compact black labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="icon ia-icon"></i> Web Archive [PDF] <div class="menu fulltext-thumbnail"> <img src="https://blobs.fatcat.wiki/thumbnail/pdf/1a/df/1adf338ef21569b6f3a35750d8b96dddcd60364e.180px.jpg" alt="fulltext thumbnail" loading="lazy"> </div> </button> </a> <a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.4310/sii.2017.v10.n4.a8"> <button class="ui left aligned compact blue labeled icon button serp-button"> <i class="unlock alternate icon" style="background-color: #fb971f;"></i> Publisher / doi.org </button> </a>