Editorial Notes [stub]

1884 Botanical Gazette  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... ntent at http://about.jstor.org/participate--jstor/individuals/early-journal--content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. BOTANICAL GAZETTE. face, while the North Carolina one is pale green on both sides. So far there seemed to be some ground for distinction, but on looking about in the woods I found several in which one of the three leaflets was partly divided. In one case the division extended two-thirds of the distance towards the midrib. Still the gray under surface seemed uniform through all these wild plants. I was surprised to find all of them barren, and went to a locality where I knew I had collected ripe fruit, and found these plants quite different from the early ones. Thev were larger and stouter, purple stemmed, with two leaves on a stalk as in he North Carolina one, the leaves pale green on both sides, as in the North Carolina one, and just opening its flowers, also as in the one from North Carolina. I did not know before that there were early and late flowering ones with us; that the early ones had gray under surfaces, and that the early ones were barren. It will be interesting to know whether this holds good in other localities. BuLt I suppose we shall have to consider A. polymorphuni as merely A. triphyllum, without even honoring it with a varietal name. By the way, Engler, in De Candole's monograph, adopts Schott's name, Ariscema quinatum for this A. polymorphuim, and Blume's name, Arisccna atrorubevs, for ouir A. triphyllum and varieties.-THOMNIAS MEEHAN.