A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit <a rel="external noopener" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/pr2017330.pdf?error=cookies_not_supported&code=f42f64c4-62fe-41d4-8850-491a26b2fa59">the original URL</a>. The file type is <code>application/pdf</code>.
Patterns of reintubation in extremely preterm infants: a longitudinal cohort study
<span title="2018-01-31">2018</span>
<i title="Springer Nature">
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/container/whvfa7dwcjdv3htgapecctdu2q" style="color: black;">Pediatric Research</a>
</i>
Preserved Fulltext
BACKGROUND: The optimal approach for reporting reintubation rates in extremely preterm infants is unknown. This study aims to longitudinally describe patterns of reintubation in this population over a broad range of observation windows following extubation. METHODS: Timing and reasons for reintubation following a first planned extubation were collected from infants with birth weight ≤ 1,250 g. An algorithm was generated to discriminate between reintubations attributable to respiratory and
<span class="external-identifiers">
<a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.330">doi:10.1038/pr.2017.330</a>
<a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29389921">pmid:29389921</a>
<a target="_blank" rel="external noopener" href="https://fatcat.wiki/release/54p76fvmszh53gstcvzlrgxhiu">fatcat:54p76fvmszh53gstcvzlrgxhiu</a>
</span>
more »
... piratory causes. Frequency and cumulative distribution curves were constructed for each category using 24 h intervals. The ability of observation windows to capture respiratory-related reintubations while limiting non-respiratory reasons was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Out of 194 infants, 91 (47%) were reintubated during hospitalization; 68% for respiratory and 32% for nonrespiratory reasons. Respiratory-related reintubation rates steadily increased from 0 to 14 days post-extubation before reaching a plateau. In contrast, non-respiratory reintubations were negligible in the first post-extubation week, but became predominant after 14 days. An observation window of 7 days captured 77% of respiratory-related reintubations while only including 14% of non-respiratory cases. CONCLUSION: Reintubation patterns are highly variable and affected by the reasons for reintubation and observation window used. Ideally, reintubation rates should be reported using a cumulative distribution curve over time.
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200510081958/https://www.nature.com/articles/pr2017330.pdf?error=cookies_not_supported&code=f42f64c4-62fe-41d4-8850-491a26b2fa59" title="fulltext PDF download" data-goatcounter-click="serp-fulltext" data-goatcounter-title="serp-fulltext">
<button class="ui simple right pointing dropdown compact black labeled icon button serp-button">
<i class="icon ia-icon"></i>
Web Archive
[PDF]
<div class="menu fulltext-thumbnail">
<img src="https://blobs.fatcat.wiki/thumbnail/pdf/53/fd/53fd2187be8c0d8e4f1e3bc756a50a1eb26c530e.180px.jpg" alt="fulltext thumbnail" loading="lazy">
</div>
</button>
</a>
<a target="_blank" rel="external noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.330">
<button class="ui left aligned compact blue labeled icon button serp-button">
<i class="external alternate icon"></i>
Publisher / doi.org
</button>
</a>