The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's Impact on Patent Litigation

Matthew Henry, John L. Turner
2005 Social Science Research Network  
More than twenty years after the establishment of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), research has yet to explain accurately the new court's impact on patent litigation, patenting and inventive activity. To address this shortcoming in the literature, we analyze a novel data set that permits us to separately consider the issues of validity and infringement in comparing the tendencies of the CAFC to those of its predecessor appeals courts. Our analysis of district and appellate
more » ... ict and appellate decisions spanning 1953-2002 yields a recasting of the "pro-patent" nature of the CAFC: while it has been significantly more reluctant than its predecessors to affirm "invalid" decisions, it has not been more reluctant to affirm "not infringed" decisions. Because of the CAFC's tendencies, district courts have decided patents "invalid" significantly less often, patentees have appealed "invalid" decisions significantly more often and infringement has become the more frequently decisive inquiry.
doi:10.2139/ssrn.713622 fatcat:vpo7q5z3kfclfm55sf4qxptyt4