The Legislative Minimum Wage

1918 Harvard Law Review  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate--jstor/individuals/early-journal--content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. NOTES 10I3 statute forbidding the judges to express any opinion on the facts is to increase the necessity for new trialsand the multiplication of new trials is one of the worst evils of our system of procedure. The law reports of states where there are such statutes are full of such cases. Too often the granting of new trials means that the party with the longer purse will be successful. That is unjust; it is undemocratic. Another very serious effect of taking from the judges their traditional power of supervising the conduct of the trial is to deter from accepting judicial office those who are best qualified. The whole system of trial by jury is dependent for its success as an efficient instrument in the administration of justice upon the competence of the judge who presides at the trial. In the admirable preliminary report on "Efficiency in the Administration of Justice" prepared for the National Economic League by President Eliot, Mr. Justice Brandeis, Dean Pound, Mr. Moorfield Storey and Mr. Adolph J. Rodenbeck, it is said:6 "In most jurisdictions there is too little power of guidance of the jury by the court. Juries are left at large to be swayed by advocacy with no judicial corrective. It is often said that we cannot trust our judges to exercise the common-law power of advising juries. But if we cannot provide a type of judge adequate to the demands of the judicial office, we must not expect the administration of justice to be efficient." The efficient administration of justice is a matter of the most vital concern to the future of this country. There can be no question that the federal courts, upon the whole, have been very efficient. This has been due in no small part to the fact that the federal judges have retained the power of supervising and controlling the conduct of the trial. It would be a mistake, merely because there may have been dissatisfaction in some isolated instances with particular federal judges, to deprive the federal courts throughout the country of the power to administer justice. Indeed, it would be more than a mistakeit would be a tragedy. TEm LEGISLATIVE MINIMUM WAGE. -Proponents of social " legislation based on hopes rather than regrets" 1 have reason for satisfaction in recent triumphs of realism in the field of constitutional law.2 The sustaining of the Oregon ten-hour law for factory workers3 has been followed by the affirming of the constitutionality of statutes in Oregon,4 Arkansas,5 and Minnesota,6 prescribing a minimum wage for women and minors in industry. Those who consider these measures 8
doi:10.2307/1327816 fatcat:3atsghhc2feozjt3ov6whcawr4