Building upon the research on metacognition and transfer in the fields of writing studies and writing centers, the following crossinstitutional study examines the relationships among writing center experiences, classroom experiences, and student perception of transfer. The study focuses on three particular classifications of metacognition, as developed in Gorzelsky et al.'s taxonomy: monitoring, control, and constructive metacognition. The central research questions framing the current study

more »

... as follows: 1) Do university students perceive themselves as engaging in transfer of metacognitive skills across writing contexts? 2) Is there a difference in students' perception of transfer facilitated by classroom experiences in comparison with writing center experiences? The study confirms some of the findings of prior research (Bromley et al.) that indicate university students are engaging in multiple forms of transfer but offers some distinctions and variations among sites, contexts, and types of metacognitive transfer. The data indicates that writing centers might be sites that facilitate more monitoring and control of revision-related transfer and foster the cumulative, encompassing phenomenon of constructive transfer more than classroom activity alone. However, students perceive classrooms to be the primary source of transfer related to assignment requirements. The largest difference in student perception across all types of transfer was that writing center clients more strongly perceived themselves to engage in classroom-related transfer than non-clients.