On the Influence of the Treatment of Heavy Elements in the Equation of State on the Resulting Values of the Adiabatic Exponent Γ1

W. Däppen, D.O. Gough, A.G. Kosovichev, E.J. Rhodes
1993 International Astronomical Union Colloquium  
Helioseismology and asteroseismology put high demands on the accuracy and consistent numerical realization of the equation of state (for a review see Däppen,these proceedings). This is explicitly illustrated by the helioseismic determination of the helium abundance of the solar convection zone in a recent investigation by Kosovichevet al.(1992). In that work it was observed that details of the treatment of the heavy elements matter more than is intuitively expected. Naively, one would expect an
more » ... uncertainty of less than 10−4in the key thermodynamic quantity, the adiabatic gradient Γ1. This is because in material of solar composition the heavy-element abundance is less than about 1.5 × 10−3by number, and under solar conditions the dominant nontrivial contributions to the seismically relevant thermodynamic quantities predicted by modern equations of state agree to a few per cent, even for the much more abundant hydrogen and helium. However, Kosovichevet al.(1992) found that uncertainties in the treatment of the heavy elements translate into discrepancies in Γ1of the order of 10−3, which is enough to disturb the helioseismic helium-abundance determination significantly. We briefly present the reason below. A forthcoming paper will show more detailed results, though some further information can already be found in papers by Kosovichevet al.(1992) and Christensen–Dalsgaard & Däppen (1992).
doi:10.1017/s0252921100017991 fatcat:kqy3tgpp35fiva7daelzg2pcom