A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2015; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Why Sexual Penetration Requires Justification
2007
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
We are also grateful to participants at seminars at the Universities of Manchester and Lancashire where a version of this article was presented. The usual caveats apply. 1 For simplicity, we will refer to this type of penetration as 'sexual penetration'. In order to limit the scope of our inquiry, we do not consider the issue of same-sex penetration, oral penetration, or penetration with object(s) or body part (s) other than a penis. Rather, our claim is limited to penile penetration of the
doi:10.1093/ojls/gqm013
fatcat:fdx3smde6fap7ev5t5re2egfwq