ThiibookM B uitorrt n *n gcwnt nt word ttoriKHKl by «" fexv ol W* UnitM Slitei Government. rjeilhtf the Uniitd Slain Grjvpnrail nor my icjtncy tbreot. not anr ot their emcWycei. trw* n rw ipteu Of invlM. o> numet any topi Ijbil'tv or fapomitiility (ot tht •OWKV. cmrfMtnai, or uttfulnai ot »nv {nlormiiicm, woaritin. taoduct, or proatt dirtond. or mrnenli tful lu UR would rat inlfirac (MHMtti owned riohtv Rilcrenca hertin to my sjeritic comrmrtai product, Urocen. or »™ke by trade name.

more »

... rrwutacturar, or Ottxrwrw. duel city cannituH or imtily Hi cufejiwuern, recommfndMian, or t#»ortnj by the United Sum Owernmait or any lotncy ttwiut. Th« **»* »wJ ooiniont of atntiort npreoed herein do not naawllv Hit* tv tatlecl IMtt Ot ttit UnitKJ Stitn GDWtnmtni or my tgencv Intro*. PBTRIBUTIOII 0? THIS EBCUi.'ENT 13 USL15:Itt3 ' FOREWORD This report documents proposed criteria and screening specifications pertinent to nuclear waste repository sites in basalt and domed salt. These proposed criteria supplement general siting criteria extracted from 10 CFR 60 and ONWI 33(2). The discussion of these criteria addresses applications and uncertainties pertinent to geologic processes affecting waste repositories.