A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2012; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
We conduct a systematic comparison of confidence intervals around estimated probabilities of default (PD), using several analytical approaches from large-sample theory and bootstrapped small-sample confidence intervals. We do so for two different PD estimation methods-cohort and duration (intensity)-using twenty-two years of credit ratings data. We find that the bootstrapped intervals for the duration-based estimates are surprisingly tight when compared with the more commonly used (asymptotic)doi:10.2139/ssrn.569841 fatcat:r6hmel5665darm3ldvhesivtsu