A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2010; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is
Expressives, perspective and presupposition
I compare Potts' use of a "judge" parameter in semantic interpretation with the use of a similar parameter in Lasersohn (2005) . The latter technique portrays the content of expressives as constant across speakers, while Pott's technique does not. The idea that the content of expressives is a kind of presupposition is also briefly defended, and a technical problem in the "dynamics" of Pott's formalism is pointed out.doi:10.1515/tl.2007.015 fatcat:ukrcqh22gvfmle5g5cur4wkjiu