of the BLS for details about changes in the CE and future plans; Taylor Blackburn for programming assistance with regard to estimating subsidy eligibility and levels for the CE sample. The views expressed in this research, including those related to statistical, methodological, technical, or operational issues, are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official positions or policies of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, or the views of other staff members within this

more »

... The author accept responsibility for all errors. This paper is released to inform interested parties of ongoing research and to encourage discussion of work in progress. Abstract Guidelines to produce a poverty measure for the U.S. are included in a document, Observations from the Interagency Technical Working Group on Developing a Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), released early in 2010. These guidelines are based on recommendations released in 1995 in a National Academy of Sciences Panel report edited by Citro and Michael (1995). The Interagency Technical Working Group (ITWG) went further than the NAS Panel and recommended that separate thresholds be produced by the housing status of families. Additional changes included expanding the reference family to include all household units with two children rather than those composed of two adults with two children only, and to use the 33 rd percentile rather than the median in the threshold calculation. A purpose of this research is to present the guidelines for the development of SPM thresholds and to lay the foundation for the estimation of the SPM thresholds at the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The Panel used three years of U.S. Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey data for the thresholds. However, in this study, five years of data are used to produce SPM thresholds. Due to differences in the number of people in the reference sample, an equivalence scale adjustment is applied to expenditures including the value of in-kind benefits. To produce thresholds for comparison, the equivalence scale is applied to the distributional results to produce thresholds for two adults and two children. Data collected in 2004 quarter two through 2009 quarter one are used to produce SPM thresholds for 2008. All of the SPM thresholds are lower than the NAS threshold and higher than the official poverty threshold with one exception. The SPM threshold for owners without a mortgage is lower than the official threshold for 2008 and is the lowest of the three housing status thresholds. SPM thresholds for owners with mortgages are the highest, followed closely by those for renters. The means, distributions and thresholds presented in this study are preliminary. Standard errors have not been produced; thus, differences are discussed in relative rather than statistical terms.