KNOWLEDGE AND EVIDENCE YOU SHOULD HAVE HAD

Matthew A. Benton
2016 Episteme: A journal of individual and social epistemology  
Epistemologists focus primarily on cases of knowledge, belief, or credence where the evidence which one possesses, or on which one is relying, plays a fundamental role in the epistemic or normative status of one's doxastic state. Recent work in epistemology goes beyond the evidence one possesses to consider the relevance for such statuses of evidence which one does not possess, particularly when there is a sense in which one should have had some evidence. I focus here on Sanford Goldberg's
more » ... ord Goldberg's approach ("Should Have Known," Synthese, Forthcoming; and "On the Epistemic Significance of Evidence You Should Have Had," Episteme, 2016, this issue); but the discussion will interest anyone working on epistemic defeat.
doi:10.1017/epi.2016.33 fatcat:7ehwq75gjjcv7pg3rseszfr7ju