Can Streumer Simply Avoid Supervenience?

Luke Elson
2019 Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy  
In his defence of an error theory for normative judgements, Bart Streumer presents a new 'reduction' argument against non- reductive normative realism. Streumer claims that unlike previous versions, his 'simple moral theory' version of the argument does not rely on the supervenience of the normative on the descriptive. But this is incorrect; without supervenience the argument does not succeed.
doi:10.26556/jesp.v16i3.508 fatcat:kobjklshczarfoq2outuqcjn6e