PERAN KOMISI INFORMASI PUBLIK DALAM PROSES EKSEKUSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN SENGKETA INFORMASI YANG BERKEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP DALAM TINJAUAN UU NO.14 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK

Slamet Haryanto, Kadi Sukarna
2017 Jurnal Ius Constituendum  
<p>The community as the users of information has sufficiently important rights <br />in the context of information disclosure. When the right to obtain information is<br />inhibited because the public entity or governor is not available in the execution of<br />the information disclosure management, then public information lawsuit will<br />emerge in the implementation of the public information disclosure. <br />The public information lawsuit happens when public entity and the user of<br
more » ... e user of<br />information disputes with something related to the rights to acquire information<br />and to use information based on legislation. The completion of the lawsuit<br />through nonlitigation ajudication is the process of the completion of public<br />information lawsuit. The completion of the information through nonlitigation<br />ajudication is hopefully able to resolve the dispute fast, low cost, and simple. <br />The problems in this thesis are: a) how the mechanisms of the settlement of<br />public information lawsuit in the Information Commission, b) what obstacles and<br />solutions of the execution implementation of the Information Commission<br />decisions which have been legally binding. <br />Answering the problem, research with juridical normative approach method<br />with analytical descriptive research specification was conducted. The type of data<br />used in this study is secondary data. <br />Based on the research that had been conducted, it was found that Public<br />Information Lawsuit Settlement Procedure, the execution of the decision or the<br />execution of the Information Commission decision which had been legally<br />binding was conducted by the competent Court, in the context that the public<br />information lawsuit settlement was the court within the jurisdiction of the pleated.<br />In this case if the pleated is State or Government public entity then the court in<br />question is the Administrative Court of the State, whereas if the execution pleated is a party outside the State or Government public entity then the competent court is the competent District Court. <br />The execution authority of the Information Commission decision granted to<br />the State Administrative Court as well as the District Court, causes the<br />information users to experience the long process of obtaining information which<br />is their needs or constitutional rights.</p>
doi:10.26623/jic.v2i1.546 fatcat:gi74vru2anftvgqdheffjrrexu