Perpetuities: Future Estates: Time for Vesting

1913 Michigan law review  
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid--seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non--commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal
more » ... out Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate--jstor/individuals/early-journal--content. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not--for--profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW Cliff. (U. S.) 590, Fed. Cas. 2, I98; Citizen's Bank v. Spencer, 126 Iowa IOI, IOI N. W. 643; Cheeney v. Inhabitants of Brookfield, 60 Mo. 53. Where general power exists to contract with reference to the subject-matter of an express contract invalid for some irregularity of its execution, but where the form and method of contracting does not violate any statutory restriction upon the power to contract, the municipality is liable for the benefits received under the invalid contract. Where, however, the statute or the charter subjects the municipality to "restrictions as to the form and method of contracting that are limitations upon the power itself, the corporation cannot be held liable by either an express or an implied contract in defiance of such restrictions." 3 MCQUILLIN, MUN. CORP., ? 118. In some cases, though, recovery has been allowed on the theory that the municipality is estopped to deny that all of the statutory requirements have not been met. Moore v. Mayor of New York, 73 N. Y. 238; Chicago v. Pittsburg, etc. R. Co., 244 Ill. 220. For an exhaustive analysis of the cases on this general subject of the quasi-contractual liability of the municipality, see 9 'MICH. L. REv. 671. As to liability for services performed under void contracts, see 17 HARV. L. REV. 343.
doi:10.2307/1274786 fatcat:7cbj5m42l5crnibdniupmtu6u4